Reasons to Lower Body Fat for Fitness, Health, and Wellness

Excess body fat is not only a cosmetic issue. At higher levels, body fat can act like an active endocrine organ that influences inflammation, insulin sensitivity, blood pressure, joint load, sleep quality, hormone signaling, and physical performance. That is why reducing excess body fat, when done safely, can improve fitness, health, and day-to-day wellness.

The goal is not to become as lean as possible. Very low body fat can harm reproductive hormones, bone density, mood, immune function, and athletic performance. The science supports a more precise goal: reduce excess body fat while preserving or increasing lean mass, strength, metabolic health, and quality of life.

This article explains the science-based reasons to lower body fat, the negative outcomes linked with obesity and high body fat, and the practical markers that matter beyond the scale.

***Disclaimer*** This is for informational purposes and does not replace medical care. Anyone with a medical condition, history of eating disorder, pregnancy, medication use, or unexplained weight change should work with a qualified healthcare professional.***

Lower body fat goals work best when they support movement, health, and daily energy.

Body fat is biologically active tissue

Body fat, or adipose tissue, stores energy. That is its most obvious role. Yet adipose tissue also releases hormones, cytokines, and signaling molecules that affect the entire body.

Healthy adipose tissue helps regulate:

• Energy storage and release

• Appetite signaling

• Sex hormone metabolism

• Immune system activity

• Insulin sensitivity

• Temperature regulation

• Cushioning and organ protection

  
  

When fat cells expand beyond their healthy storage capacity, the tissue can become dysfunctional. Research shows that enlarged adipocytes may become more inflammatory, less responsive to insulin, and more likely to release free fatty acids into circulation. This can affect the liver, skeletal muscle, pancreas, blood vessels, and brain.

A key point from metabolic research is that fat distribution matters. Subcutaneous fat sits under the skin. Visceral fat sits deeper in the abdomen around internal organs. Visceral fat has a stronger link with cardiometabolic disease, including insulin resistance, type 2 diabetes, dyslipidemia, and cardiovascular risk.

That explains why waist circumference and waist-to-height ratio often provide useful health information beyond body weight alone. Two people can weigh the same and have very different levels of visceral fat, muscle mass, fitness, and metabolic risk.

Lower body fat can improve insulin sensitivity and blood sugar regulation

One of the strongest science-based reasons to reduce excess body fat is better glucose control.

Insulin helps move glucose from the bloodstream into cells, especially muscle and liver cells. When body fat is high, especially visceral and ectopic fat, cells can become less responsive to insulin. The pancreas then has to produce more insulin to keep blood glucose in range. Over time, this can contribute to prediabetes and type 2 diabetes.

Research shows that weight loss and fat loss can improve insulin sensitivity, reduce fasting glucose, lower hemoglobin A1c in many people with type 2 diabetes, and reduce the need for diabetes medication in some cases. The DiRECT trial, published in The Lancet, showed that a structured weight management program produced diabetes remission in a substantial number of participants with type 2 diabetes, especially when weight loss was larger and sustained.

Fat loss can improve glucose metabolism through several mechanisms:

• Less fat accumulation in the liver and pancreas

• Lower circulating free fatty acids

• Reduced inflammatory signaling

• Better skeletal muscle glucose uptake

• Improved insulin receptor signaling

• Better mitochondrial function in muscle

  
  

Muscle also matters. Resistance training helps preserve or build lean mass during fat loss. That is important because skeletal muscle is a major site for glucose disposal. A fat loss plan that includes strength training can support better body composition than dieting alone.

Practical marker to track

A scale weight trend can be useful, but metabolic markers tell a deeper story. Relevant markers may include fasting glucose, fasting insulin, hemoglobin A1c, triglycerides, HDL cholesterol, waist circumference, blood pressure, and liver enzymes. These should be interpreted by a qualified clinician.

Lower body fat reduces cardiovascular disease risk factors

High body fat is closely linked with cardiovascular risk, especially when fat accumulates centrally. Peer-reviewed studies have connected obesity with hypertension, dyslipidemia, atherosclerosis, heart failure, atrial fibrillation, and coronary heart disease.

Fat loss can improve several cardiovascular risk factors:

Cardiovascular marker	Common effect of reducing excess body fat
Blood pressure	Often decreases, especially with improved diet and activity
Triglycerides	Often decrease with fat loss and improved carbohydrate quality
HDL cholesterol	May improve with exercise, fat loss, and better diet quality
LDL cholesterol	May improve depending on diet composition and genetics
Inflammation markers	Often decrease as visceral fat decreases
Vascular function	May improve with exercise and metabolic health gains

Blood pressure deserves special attention. Extra body fat can raise blood pressure through several pathways, including higher sympathetic nervous system activity, increased blood volume, kidney sodium retention, sleep apnea, and hormonal changes involving the renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system.

Even modest fat loss can reduce cardiovascular strain. The effect tends to be stronger when fat loss comes with regular physical activity, increased cardiorespiratory fitness, higher fiber intake, reduced alcohol intake when needed, better sleep, and lower sodium intake for sodium-sensitive individuals.

Cardiorespiratory fitness also modifies risk. Some people with higher body weight but strong aerobic fitness have lower risk than sedentary people with the same weight. Still, high visceral fat remains a concern. The best target is not only a lower number on the scale. It is better cardiovascular capacity, lower central adiposity, and improved metabolic markers.

Waist measurement and movement capacity show progress that the scale can miss.

Lower body fat can improve physical performance

Excess body fat can make many fitness tasks harder because it adds non-contractile mass. Muscle produces force. Fat mass adds load without directly producing movement. This affects running, jumping, climbing, agility, calisthenics, and endurance work.

For many people, lower excess body fat improves:

• Relative strength

• Aerobic efficiency

• Movement economy

• Heat tolerance during exercise

• Agility and change of direction

• Joint comfort during weight-bearing activity

• Ability to perform bodyweight exercises

  
  

Relative strength means strength compared with body weight. A person may keep the same absolute strength but improve pull-ups, push-ups, hill walking, running pace, or stair climbing after losing fat because there is less total mass to move.

Power-to-weight ratio improves when lean mass is protected

Athletes often care about power-to-weight ratio. This applies to non-athletes too. Walking up stairs, getting off the floor, hiking, cycling uphill, or carrying groceries all depend on strength relative to body mass.

The key is to lose fat while preserving lean mass. Rapid weight loss without resistance training and adequate protein can reduce muscle mass. That can lower resting energy expenditure, impair strength, and increase the chance of weight regain.

A well-designed fat loss plan usually includes:

• Progressive resistance training

• Enough protein across the day

• A moderate calorie deficit

• Adequate sleep

• Recovery days

• Aerobic training matched to fitness level

• Regular follow-up and adjustment

  
  

Movement quality can improve

Excess body fat can alter posture, gait mechanics, and joint angles during movement. It can also limit range of motion during certain exercises. Fat loss may make it easier to squat, hinge, lunge, rotate, and brace effectively.

This does not mean people must be lean to move well. People at many body sizes can become strong and skilled. The point is that reducing excess fat can remove a mechanical barrier and make training feel more efficient.

Lower body fat can decrease joint stress and osteoarthritis burden

The musculoskeletal system carries body weight every day. Higher body fat can increase mechanical loading on weight-bearing joints, especially the knees, hips, ankles, and lower back. It can also contribute to joint inflammation through adipokines and inflammatory mediators.

Knee osteoarthritis has a well-established association with obesity. Mechanical load is one reason. Inflammatory signaling is another. Studies suggest that weight loss can reduce knee pain and improve function in many adults with overweight or obesity and knee osteoarthritis.

The joint benefits of fat loss often become more meaningful when combined with strength training. Stronger muscles around a joint can improve stability, absorb force, and support better movement mechanics.

Helpful training strategies often include:

• Low-impact aerobic work such as cycling, swimming, rowing, or incline walking

• Progressive lower body strength training

• Mobility work targeted to individual limitations

• Gradual increases in walking volume

• Footwear that supports the chosen activity

• Pain-informed programming rather than pushing through sharp pain

  
  

For people with joint pain, fat loss should not rely only on high-impact exercise. Nutrition usually drives most of the energy deficit, while exercise preserves muscle, improves conditioning, and supports long-term maintenance.

Lower body fat can improve sleep and breathing

High body fat, especially around the neck and abdomen, can raise the risk of obstructive sleep apnea. Sleep apnea occurs when breathing repeatedly stops or becomes shallow during sleep. It can reduce oxygen levels, fragment sleep, and increase cardiovascular stress.

Obstructive sleep apnea is associated with:

• Daytime fatigue

• Morning headaches

• Poor concentration

• High blood pressure

• Insulin resistance

• Increased cardiovascular risk

• Mood symptoms

• Reduced exercise recovery

  
  

Fat loss can reduce sleep apnea severity for many people, though it may not fully resolve it. Some people still need medical treatment such as continuous positive airway pressure therapy, oral appliances, or other interventions.

Sleep also affects body fat regulation. Short sleep and poor sleep quality can alter appetite hormones, increase hunger, reduce impulse control, impair glucose tolerance, and reduce training recovery. This creates a two-way relationship: high body fat can worsen sleep, and poor sleep can make fat loss harder.

A science-based fat loss plan should treat sleep as a core variable, not an afterthought. Consistent sleep timing, adequate sleep duration, reduced evening alcohol, treatment for sleep apnea when present, and a dark sleeping environment can all support better outcomes.

Better sleep supports recovery, appetite regulation, and long-term fat loss.

Lower body fat can improve liver health

The liver plays a central role in metabolism. It processes nutrients, stores glycogen, produces bile, and helps regulate blood lipids. When excess fat accumulates in the liver, it can lead to metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease, formerly often called nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.

Liver fat is strongly linked with insulin resistance, high triglycerides, abdominal obesity, and type 2 diabetes. For some people, fatty liver can progress to inflammation, fibrosis, cirrhosis, and liver cancer.

Research supports weight loss as a major therapy for fatty liver. Greater weight loss tends to produce greater improvements in liver fat and inflammation. Exercise can also reduce liver fat, even when scale weight changes are modest.

Practical lifestyle targets for liver health often include:

• Reducing excess calorie intake

• Increasing dietary fiber

• Limiting sugar-sweetened beverages

• Reducing ultra-processed food intake

• Improving protein quality and adequacy

• Building regular aerobic activity

• Adding resistance training

• Reducing alcohol when appropriate

  
  

Liver enzymes such as ALT and AST may improve with fat loss, but normal liver enzymes do not always rule out fatty liver. Medical evaluation is needed when liver disease is suspected.

Lower body fat can reduce chronic low-grade inflammation

Adipose tissue can affect immune signaling. When fat cells enlarge, immune cells such as macrophages can accumulate in adipose tissue. This can increase production of inflammatory cytokines. Chronic low-grade inflammation is linked with insulin resistance, atherosclerosis, joint pain, and other health problems.

Common inflammatory markers, such as C-reactive protein, tend to be higher in many people with obesity. Fat loss can reduce these markers, especially when it lowers visceral fat and improves physical activity patterns.

This matters for wellness because inflammation can influence how people feel. Chronic inflammation may contribute to fatigue, pain sensitivity, poor recovery, and lower exercise tolerance. It is not the only cause of those symptoms, but it can be part of the picture.

Menu quality matters here. A calorie deficit can reduce fat mass, but the type of food pattern affects inflammation, satiety, and adherence. Menus rich in minimally processed foods, lean proteins, legumes, fruits, vegetables, whole grains, nuts, seeds, and unsaturated fats often support better inflammatory profiles than menus rich in refined grains, added sugars, and highly processed foods.

Lower body fat can support hormonal health

Body fat interacts with the endocrine system. At higher levels, excess fat can alter insulin, leptin, adiponectin, cortisol rhythms, sex hormones, and thyroid-related signaling.

In men, obesity is associated with lower total testosterone and lower sex hormone-binding globulin. Weight loss may improve testosterone levels in some men, especially when fat loss is substantial and achieved through sustainable lifestyle changes.

In women, excess body fat can worsen insulin resistance and may interact with conditions such as polycystic ovary syndrome. Fat loss may improve ovulatory function and metabolic markers in some people with PCOS, though care must be individualized.

Leptin is another key hormone. Fat cells produce leptin, which helps signal energy availability to the brain. In obesity, leptin levels are often high, but the brain may become less responsive to the signal. This is sometimes called leptin resistance. Fat loss, improved sleep, and regular activity may help improve appetite regulation, but the system remains complex.

Very low body fat can create hormonal problems

Lower is not always better. When energy intake is too low for too long, the body may reduce reproductive hormone output, thyroid hormone conversion, and resting energy expenditure. Athletes and active people can develop relative energy deficiency in sport, known as RED-S. This can affect bone health, menstrual function, testosterone, immunity, mood, and performance.

A healthy fat loss goal should protect:

• Strength

• Training performance

• Menstrual regularity when applicable

• Libido

• Mood

• Sleep

• Bone health

• Normal hunger and fullness cues

• Social functioning

  
  

If fat loss causes persistent fatigue, cold intolerance, irritability, obsessive food thoughts, loss of menstrual cycle, declining performance, or binge-restrict cycles, the plan needs correction.

Lower body fat can improve reproductive and pregnancy-related health

High body fat and obesity can affect fertility and pregnancy outcomes. Research links obesity with higher risk of ovulatory dysfunction, reduced fertility treatment success in some populations, gestational diabetes, hypertensive disorders of pregnancy, cesarean delivery, and complications for both parent and infant.

For men, obesity is associated with lower semen quality in some studies, altered reproductive hormones, and erectile dysfunction risk. The mechanisms may include inflammation, oxidative stress, vascular function, insulin resistance, and hormone changes.

Preconception fat loss, when appropriate and medically supervised, can improve metabolic health before pregnancy. During pregnancy, weight loss is not usually the goal unless directed by a medical team. The focus shifts to appropriate weight gain, nutrition quality, glucose control, blood pressure management, and safe activity.

Lower body fat may lower cancer risk for several cancer types

The relationship between body fat and cancer is complex, but evidence links excess adiposity with increased risk of several cancers. These include postmenopausal breast cancer, colorectal cancer, endometrial cancer, kidney cancer, liver cancer, pancreatic cancer, and esophageal adenocarcinoma.

Possible mechanisms include:

• Chronic inflammation

• Higher insulin and insulin-like growth factor signaling

• Altered sex hormone levels

• Changes in adipokines such as leptin and adiponectin

• Oxidative stress

• Changes in gut microbiome and bile acid metabolism

  
  

Fat loss cannot guarantee cancer prevention. Genetics, age, smoking, alcohol, infections, screening, and environmental exposures also matter. Still, maintaining a healthy body composition is one modifiable factor that may reduce risk over time.

Lower body fat can improve brain health and mood-related outcomes

High body fat is associated with higher risk of depression, cognitive decline, sleep disturbance, and reduced quality of life in many studies. These relationships are bidirectional. Depression can increase weight gain risk through changes in appetite, activity, sleep, medication effects, and stress physiology. High body fat can then worsen inflammation, sleep apnea, physical discomfort, and self-image stress.

Fat loss may improve mood for some people, especially when paired with exercise, better sleep, and improved fitness. Exercise itself has strong evidence for mood support. Aerobic and resistance training can reduce symptoms of depression and anxiety in many populations.

A safe plan should avoid shame-based motivation. Shame may drive short-term restriction, but it often damages consistency and mental health. A better approach uses measurable behaviors:

• Train consistently

• Eat enough protein and fiber

• Build meals around mostly minimally processed foods

• Sleep enough

• Manage stress

• Track progress without obsession

• Adjust based on data, not guilt

  
  

Mental health support may be necessary when eating patterns feel compulsive, body image distress is severe, or weight loss efforts increase anxiety.

Lower body fat can improve daily energy and quality of life

Fitness and health markers matter, but daily life matters too. Lowering excess body fat can make routine tasks feel easier. Many people notice improvements in walking, stairs, heat tolerance, tying shoes, playing with children, hiking, travel comfort, and general confidence in movement.

Quality of life can improve when fat loss reduces pain, shortness of breath, reflux, snoring, fatigue, or blood pressure concerns. These benefits often appear before a person reaches a target weight.

The most useful goal is not defined only by the mirror. It is a body that performs better and feels more capable.

The negative outcomes of obesity and high body fat

Obesity is a complex chronic disease influenced by genetics, biology, environment, food systems, sleep, stress, medications, socioeconomic factors, and behavior. It should not be reduced to willpower. At the same time, high body fat can produce real health risks.

The science links obesity and high body fat with higher risk of:

• Type 2 diabetes

• Hypertension

• Coronary heart disease

• Stroke

• Heart failure

• Atrial fibrillation

• Dyslipidemia

• Obstructive sleep apnea

• Fatty liver disease

• Gallbladder disease

• Osteoarthritis

• Chronic kidney disease

• Certain cancers

• Gastroesophageal reflux disease

• Infertility and pregnancy complications

• Reduced mobility

• Lower quality of life

• Higher all-cause mortality at severe levels of obesity

  
  

Metabolic syndrome is a common cluster

Metabolic syndrome is a cluster of risk factors that often travel together. It commonly includes abdominal obesity, high blood pressure, high triglycerides, low HDL cholesterol, and elevated fasting glucose. This pattern increases risk for type 2 diabetes and cardiovascular disease.

Reducing visceral fat can improve several parts of this cluster at once. That is one reason waist measurement can be useful.

Ectopic fat creates additional risk

Ectopic fat means fat stored in places where it does not belong, such as the liver, pancreas, skeletal muscle, and around the heart. Ectopic fat can disrupt organ function even when total body weight does not seem extreme.

This helps explain why some people with a normal BMI still have high metabolic risk, while some people with a higher BMI have better-than-expected blood markers. Body composition, fat distribution, fitness, genetics, and lifestyle all influence risk.

Severe obesity increases mechanical and medical burden

As obesity severity increases, the physical and medical burden often increases. Daily movement may become harder. Joint pain may worsen. Sleep apnea becomes more likely. Blood pressure, glucose, and lipids may become harder to control. Surgical risk can increase. Some medications may need dose adjustments.

A compassionate view is necessary. People living with obesity often face stigma, which can worsen healthcare avoidance and mental stress. Effective care should combine scientific accuracy with respect.

BMI is useful, but it is not enough

Body mass index, or BMI, estimates weight relative to height. It is easy to measure and useful for population-level research. Yet BMI does not directly measure body fat, muscle mass, visceral fat, or fitness.

BMI can misclassify muscular individuals as overweight or obese. It can also miss higher body fat in people with lower muscle mass. For personal assessment, BMI should be combined with other measures.

Better tools may include:

• Waist circumference

• Waist-to-height ratio

• Body composition testing

• Strength markers

• Cardiorespiratory fitness

• Blood pressure

• Blood lipids

• Glucose and insulin markers

• Liver markers

• Sleep quality

• Physical function

• Medical history

  
  

No single number defines health. A good assessment looks for patterns.

A healthier body fat target depends on the person

There is no universal “perfect” body fat percentage. Healthy ranges vary by sex, age, genetics, sport, ethnicity, medical history, and life stage.

A competitive endurance athlete, a powerlifter, a postpartum parent, a person with type 2 diabetes, and a person recovering from an eating disorder may need very different goals.

A useful target should meet these standards:

• It improves health markers or reduces risk

• It supports strength and daily function

• It is maintainable without extreme restriction

• It does not harm sleep, mood, hormones, or social life

• It allows adequate nutrient intake

• It fits the person’s medical context

  
  

For many people, losing 5 to 10 percent of starting body weight can improve blood pressure, glucose, triglycerides, and liver fat. Some conditions may require greater weight loss for larger benefits. The right target should be selected with context.

Food quality helps preserve muscle, control appetite, and improve metabolic health during fat loss.

Sustainable fat loss requires an energy deficit and behavior design

Fat loss requires an energy deficit over time. The body must use stored energy. That principle is clear. The hard part is creating the deficit in a way that controls hunger, preserves muscle, supports training, and can be maintained.

Protein protects lean mass and improves satiety

Higher-protein diets can improve satiety and help preserve lean mass during weight loss, especially when combined with resistance training. Protein needs depend on body size, age, training, kidney health, and calorie intake. Active people in a deficit often need more protein than sedentary people at maintenance.

Helpful protein sources include lean meats, poultry, fish, eggs, Greek yogurt, cottage cheese, tofu, tempeh, legumes, protein powders when useful, and other high-quality options.

Fiber helps control appetite and metabolic risk

Fiber slows digestion, supports gut health, improves fullness, and can help lower LDL cholesterol. Higher fiber intake is also linked with lower cardiometabolic risk.

Useful sources include vegetables, fruits, oats, beans, lentils, whole grains, chia seeds, flaxseed, nuts, and seeds.

Resistance training preserves function

Strength training signals the body to keep muscle while fat is lost. It also improves insulin sensitivity, bone density, joint stability, and long-term independence.

A basic program should include patterns such as:

• Squat or leg press

• Hip hinge

• Push

• Pull

• Carry

• Core bracing

• Single-leg work when appropriate

  
  

The details should match experience, injury history, equipment, and recovery capacity.

Aerobic training improves the heart and metabolism

Aerobic training helps improve cardiovascular fitness, mitochondrial function, blood pressure, insulin sensitivity, and calorie expenditure. It does not need to be extreme. Walking, cycling, swimming, hiking, rowing, dancing, and intervals can all work.

The best form is one that can be repeated consistently and progressed safely.

Sleep and stress control affect adherence

Sleep loss increases hunger and can reduce impulse control. Chronic stress can also affect appetite, cravings, alcohol use, sleep quality, and recovery. Stress does not make fat loss impossible, but it changes the plan. More structure, simpler meals, lower training volume, and better recovery may be needed during stressful periods.

The risks of losing body fat too aggressively

A fast drop in scale weight can look successful at first, but aggressive dieting often creates problems.

Possible consequences include:

• Muscle loss

• Strength decline

• Fatigue

• Irritability

• Increased hunger

• Poor sleep

• Nutrient deficiencies

• Constipation

• Gallstone risk with rapid weight loss

• Reduced training performance

• Menstrual disruption

• Binge-restrict cycles

• Weight regain

  
  

A slower, more controlled rate often produces better body composition and better maintenance. People with severe obesity or urgent medical needs may use more intensive approaches, but these should be medically supervised.

Medications and bariatric surgery also have evidence-based roles for some people with obesity. They are not shortcuts. They are medical tools that work best with nutrition, activity, monitoring, and long-term support.

What progress should look like

Progress is not always linear. Water retention, sodium intake, menstrual cycle changes, training soreness, travel, medication changes, and stress can all affect scale weight.

Better progress tracking includes several measures:

Category	Useful markers
Body composition	Waist, body weight trend, progress photos, clothing fit
Fitness	Strength, walking pace, resting heart rate, endurance, mobility
Metabolic health	Blood pressure, glucose, A1c, lipids, liver enzymes
Wellness	Sleep quality, energy, hunger control, mood, pain levels
Adherence	Meal consistency, training frequency, step count, recovery habits

A strong plan should produce more than weight loss. It should improve the person’s ability to live, move, and recover.

How professional support can help

Lowering excess body fat is simple in theory and complex in real life. Biology pushes back against weight loss through hunger, lower energy expenditure, and habit pressure. Life adds stress, time limits, social events, injuries, and inconsistent schedules.

Professional support can help by creating a plan that fits the individual rather than forcing a generic template.

Support may include:

• Body composition and lifestyle assessment

• Realistic goal setting

• Nutrition planning

• Strength and conditioning guidance

• Progress tracking

• Accountability

• Adjustments when weight loss stalls

• Maintenance planning

• Coordination with medical providers when needed

  
  

The maintenance phase deserves as much attention as the fat loss phase. Many people can lose weight for a short period. The real goal is to keep the health benefits while living a normal life.

If you want help building a science-based fat loss plan that supports fitness, health, and wellness, reach out so I can assist with assessment, strategy, accountability, and ongoing adjustments.

Strength training helps protect lean mass while body fat decreases.

Key takeaway

Reducing excess body fat can improve insulin sensitivity, cardiovascular risk factors, liver health, joint comfort, sleep quality, physical performance, hormone function, and overall quality of life. The strongest benefits come from reducing visceral and ectopic fat while preserving muscle and improving fitness.

The goal is not extreme leanness. The goal is a healthier, stronger, more sustainable body composition. The best plan combines nutrition, resistance training, aerobic activity, sleep, stress management, and progress tracking. It also respects medical history, mental health, and personal lifestyle.

A lower body fat level is most valuable when it helps the body work better.

I am here to help you with decreasing your body fat and increasing your lean muscle mass! I have access to nutritional supplements that may help you with appetite control, boost metabolism, improve sleep quality, and fuel your workouts. Additional savings are available when you become my preferred customer. Visit www.advocare.com/130850260

Warmly,

-Coach James

JHenderson Training & Consulting

references:

1. Jensen, M. D., Ryan, D. H., Apovian, C. M., et al. “2013 AHA/ACC/TOS Guideline for the Management of Overweight and Obesity in Adults.” Circulation, 2014.

   
   

2. Heymsfield, S. B., and Wadden, T. A. “Mechanisms, Pathophysiology, and Management of Obesity.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 2017.

   
   

3. Lean, M. E. J., Leslie, W. S., Barnes, A. C., et al. “Primary Care-Led Weight Management for Remission of Type 2 Diabetes.” The Lancet, 2018.

   
   

4. Look AHEAD Research Group. “Cardiovascular Effects of Intensive Lifestyle Intervention in Type 2 Diabetes.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 2013.

   
   

5. Ross, R., Neeland, I. J., Yamashita, S., et al. “Waist Circumference as a Vital Sign in Clinical Practice.” Nature Reviews Endocrinology, 2020.

   
   

6. Després, J. P. “Body Fat Distribution and Risk of Cardiovascular Disease.” Circulation, 2012.

   
   

7. Powell-Wiley, T. M., Poirier, P., Burke, L. E., et al. “Obesity and Cardiovascular Disease.” Circulation, 2021.

   
   

8. Kahn, S. E., Hull, R. L., and Utzschneider, K. M. “Mechanisms Linking Obesity to Insulin Resistance and Type 2 Diabetes.” Nature, 2006.

   
   

9. Samuel, V. T., and Shulman, G. I. “The Pathogenesis of Insulin Resistance.” Cell, 2012.

   
   

10. Fabbrini, E., Sullivan, S., and Klein, S. “Obesity and Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.” Hepatology, 2010.

11. Vilar-Gomez, E., Martinez-Perez, Y., Calzadilla-Bertot, L., et al. “Weight Loss Through Lifestyle Modification Significantly Reduces Features of Nonalcoholic Steatohepatitis.” Gastroenterology, 2015.

12. Messier, S. P., Mihalko, S. L., Legault, C., et al. “Effects of Intensive Diet and Exercise on Knee Joint Loads, Inflammation, and Clinical Outcomes Among Overweight and Obese Adults With Knee Osteoarthritis.” JAMA, 2013.

13. Peppard, P. E., Young, T., Palta, M., Dempsey, J., and Skatrud, J. “Longitudinal Study of Moderate Weight Change and Sleep-Disordered Breathing.” JAMA, 2000.

14. Foster, G. D., Borradaile, K. E., Sanders, M. H., et al. “A Randomized Study on the Effect of Weight Loss on Obstructive Sleep Apnea Among Obese Patients With Type 2 Diabetes.” Archives of Internal Medicine, 2009.

15. Calle, E. E., Rodriguez, C., Walker-Thurmond, K., and Thun, M. J. “Overweight, Obesity, and Mortality From Cancer in a Prospectively Studied Cohort of U.S. Adults.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 2003.

16. Lauby-Secretan, B., Scoccianti, C., Loomis, D., et al. “Body Fatness and Cancer.” The New England Journal of Medicine, 2016.

17. Donnelly, J. E., Blair, S. N., Jakicic, J. M., et al. “Appropriate Physical Activity Intervention Strategies for Weight Loss and Prevention of Weight Regain for Adults.” Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise, 2009.

18. Morton, R. W., Murphy, K. T., McKellar, S. R., et al. “A Systematic Review, Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression of the Effect of Protein Supplementation on Resistance Training-Induced Gains in Muscle Mass and Strength.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2018.

19. Phillips, S. M., and Van Loon, L. J. C. “Dietary Protein for Athletes.” Journal of Sports Sciences, 2011.

20. Mountjoy, M., Sundgot-Borgen, J., Burke, L., et al. “The IOC Consensus Statement on Relative Energy Deficiency in Sport.” British Journal of Sports Medicine, 2014.